Guest Blog: What If a Church Had an Expiration Date?

Today’s guest post is written by author and pastor Russell Rathbun. I got to meet Russell at Princeton Seminary a few years ago, and really enjoyed hearing him preach. Russell is a founding minister with Debbie Blue of House of Mercy, a pioneering emergent church in St. Paul, Minnesota. He’s the author of a brand new book called nuChristian: Finding Faith in a New Generation. nuChristian responds to recent reports of Christianity’s image problem. In nuChristian, Russell offers practical suggestions for leaders who want to reach out to the new generation with a Christlike community that is transparent, holistic, loving, engaged, just and humble. I asked Russell to write a guest post today for his stop at Pomomusings on his Virtual Book Tour. I hope you enjoy his post, “What if a Church Had an Expiration Date?”

What If a Church Had an Expiration Date?

Russell Rathbun

I have talked to a lot of people who are starting churches and a lot more people who are trying to keep churches from dying. Both missions are very hard to accomplish. So, I had an idea. What if you started a church with an expiration date? Say, five years. That would be just enough time for an energized core group to get together and build a unique community—an incarnation of the Body of Christ that addresses a particular time and place, the context in which they are living. They could welcome friends and newcomers who are interested, intrigued, and drawn in by the body’s particular vision, worship, service, study, and creativity, inviting the visitor to become part of the life of the community. Finally this expanded group of believers would begin to articulate new visions for changing contexts and to develop new core groups around those visions, groups who would then go out and start several new churches with new expiration dates.

[Read more...]

Starting up a Theology on Tap in Livermore

Wow. Not that I hadn’t received fair warning from some of you – but I didn’t really believe it. Less than 6 hours after this posting went live, I received an email from the woman who oversees Theology on Tap nationwide. She said I’m more than welcome to join “Renew Theology on Tap” (via registration process and fees), but I am not to use the name “Theology on Tap” or any derivatives (which she said includes “Theology on the Rocks”). I guess I understand this from a technical/legal standpoint, but wow…they really are all over this. And for a group that will be as small as ours…not making any money off it…just seems a little over the top. When do copyrights start to infringe on the ministry of the greater church…?

beerThis summer we are going to be starting up Theology on Tap, sponsored by Asbury United Methodist Church. I’m still trying to finalize the name, whether we’ll go with the traditional “Theology on Tap” or try something different like “Theology on the Rocks.” Any creative suggestions are welcomed!

It is our hope that it will serve as both a fellowship opportunity for young adults (and others) in our congregation, but we’re also hoping that it will be an outreach and mission of the church, that we’ll be able to take some really important and relevant conversations about life and spirituality outside the walls of the church (where many young adults wouldn’t necessarily choose to be at 8:50am on Sunday mornings) and to places where people hang out.

I am sure that many of you have been a part of similar programs, and I’d love to hear what worked well for you, what didn’t work, what conversations really went well, which ones didn’t seem to go anywhere. Any advice would be very helpful.

Jesus, the Bible & Homosexuality, by Jack Rogers: Final Thoughts

jack-rogers-bookAfter having reviewed Jack Rogers’s “Jesus, the Bible and Homosexuality” over the past few weeks, I still want to say I highly encourage you to check out this book and give it a read yourself. Even if you are already someone who is 100% affirming of LGBT persons, it’s still an important and helpful book to read. Rogers lays a strong foundation for supporting an affirming perspective and gives good scriptural support for such a view.

One of the strengths of Rogers’s book is that he actively engages with Scripture all throughout his book. One of the many critiques of those of us who are affirming of LGBT persons is that we are completely disregarding scripture. Or that we’re allowing culture to dictate our understanding of scripture. However, Rogers shows that the interpretations of the few passages typically used to speak of the sinfulness of homosexuality are simply incorrect interpretations. Or, if you’re not willing to accept that they’re “incorrect,” Rogers at least shows there is the possibility of holding a different interpretation of the passage while still remaining faithful to scripture.

[Read more...]