<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Brief Reflection on Lisa Larges&#8217; Approval for Ordination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/</link>
	<description>Design, Ministry &#38; Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:51:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-60027</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-60027</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;Yup.  Convert people to a religion of non-conversion.  Good luck with that!

Their real religion is Liberalism, and believe you me, they will make every effort to convert you to that one.  The christian missionaries of old had nothing on these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Yup.  Convert people to a religion of non-conversion.  Good luck with that!</p>
<p>Their real religion is Liberalism, and believe you me, they will make every effort to convert you to that one.  The christian missionaries of old had nothing on these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-60026</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-60026</guid>
		<description>Yup.  Convert people to a religion of non-conversion.  Good luck with that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Convert people to a religion of non-conversion.  Good luck with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-60024</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-60024</guid>
		<description>Wonderful.  And now you why the mainline denominations are going extinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful.  And now you why the mainline denominations are going extinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-60021</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-60021</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a valid argument if there are Christians or churches spending money on things  that promote hatred and intolerance rather than using money in ways that foster love and help the poor, oppressed and marginalized, i.e. what is currently happening at the moment in Uganda.  

We need less Christians trying to convert and save people who they judge and deem different and unworthy (and even worse criminalize and persecute in the Uganda case), and more Christians reaching out to others in love, regardless of economics, gender, sexual orientation, culture, religious beliefs, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a valid argument if there are Christians or churches spending money on things  that promote hatred and intolerance rather than using money in ways that foster love and help the poor, oppressed and marginalized, i.e. what is currently happening at the moment in Uganda.  </p>
<p>We need less Christians trying to convert and save people who they judge and deem different and unworthy (and even worse criminalize and persecute in the Uganda case), and more Christians reaching out to others in love, regardless of economics, gender, sexual orientation, culture, religious beliefs, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fortuitous Bouncing &#171; Man of Depravity</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59997</link>
		<dc:creator>Fortuitous Bouncing &#171; Man of Depravity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59997</guid>
		<description>[...] shares some thoughts on the ordination of Lisa Larges, an openly lesbian woman, into the PCUSA last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shares some thoughts on the ordination of Lisa Larges, an openly lesbian woman, into the PCUSA last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59971</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59971</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What I was trying to say earlier is that there are churches spend money on anti-homosexual campaigns when they could be spending that money on the poor or other ministries&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s a tautology if ever there was one.  Churches are spending money on &#039;x&#039; when they could have been spending money on &#039;y&#039; is not a valid argument for why churches should spend money on &#039;y.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What I was trying to say earlier is that there are churches spend money on anti-homosexual campaigns when they could be spending that money on the poor or other ministries</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s a tautology if ever there was one.  Churches are spending money on &#8216;x&#8217; when they could have been spending money on &#8216;y&#8217; is not a valid argument for why churches should spend money on &#8216;y.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59970</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59970</guid>
		<description>Ok. Good points.
What I was trying to say earlier is that there are churches spend money on anti-homosexual campaigns when they could be spending that money on the poor or other ministries
i disagree that For Bible Tells Me So is propaganda...sounds like you haven&#039;t watched it and you are judging it by its name and description alone.
Guess we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. Good points.<br />
What I was trying to say earlier is that there are churches spend money on anti-homosexual campaigns when they could be spending that money on the poor or other ministries<br />
i disagree that For Bible Tells Me So is propaganda&#8230;sounds like you haven&#8217;t watched it and you are judging it by its name and description alone.<br />
Guess we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59967</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59967</guid>
		<description>Andy,   you still ddin&#039;t answer my question.  You claimed that churches spend millions on antihomosexual campaigns, and don&#039;t spend one dime on helping the hungry.  PROVE IT.  You mention the Layman (not a reliable new source IMHO) but of the churches listed, I daresay that they give signifigantly to feeding the hungry, and helping the poor.

My point was that you made a blatent statement &quot; There are churches who spend exorbitant amounts of money (in the millions) to crusade against homosexuals while not giving a dime to the poor.&quot;  Yet, you cannot back this claim up.  Yes there may have been a mega church who spent money on billboards (that you admit you cannot recall the name of the church) but did they really not care fo the least of these among us?  

My point was, I am tired of people making claims and statments that folks who may be opposed to homosexual practice, have no compassion, no love for justice, and no love for mercy.  This is not true.

As to your claim that &quot;For the Bible tells me so&quot; is a documentary-please don&#039;t insult my intelligence or anyone else&#039;s, it is propganda and you know it.

All that being said,  I suspect that you and I will have to live in the realm where we cannot agree...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,   you still ddin&#8217;t answer my question.  You claimed that churches spend millions on antihomosexual campaigns, and don&#8217;t spend one dime on helping the hungry.  PROVE IT.  You mention the Layman (not a reliable new source IMHO) but of the churches listed, I daresay that they give signifigantly to feeding the hungry, and helping the poor.</p>
<p>My point was that you made a blatent statement &#8221; There are churches who spend exorbitant amounts of money (in the millions) to crusade against homosexuals while not giving a dime to the poor.&#8221;  Yet, you cannot back this claim up.  Yes there may have been a mega church who spent money on billboards (that you admit you cannot recall the name of the church) but did they really not care fo the least of these among us?  </p>
<p>My point was, I am tired of people making claims and statments that folks who may be opposed to homosexual practice, have no compassion, no love for justice, and no love for mercy.  This is not true.</p>
<p>As to your claim that &#8220;For the Bible tells me so&#8221; is a documentary-please don&#8217;t insult my intelligence or anyone else&#8217;s, it is propganda and you know it.</p>
<p>All that being said,  I suspect that you and I will have to live in the realm where we cannot agree&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59965</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59965</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Church is often very hypocritical, and sinful, in the way the we have dealt with homosexual people and with the issue in general, but it seems you paint with too broad a brush as well...

Is there really no room for someone to call homosexual behavior sin without being labeled a bigot?

In our church homosexual people are welcomed, but homosexual behavior is considered sin.  To ask for us to affirm something that we believe scripture is clear on denying, is to ask us to violate our conscience, surely you understand that?

I recognize that there are many who are motivated by fear of homosexuals because of the cultural pressure to do so, and because they have never known any...  but I am sure you recognize that there are those of us in the church who fall into a different category?

I don&#039;t see Jesus affirming anyone, welcoming everyone while simultaneously inviting them to become the kind of person whom God can affirm.  Accepting Jesus&#039; welcome &lt;i&gt;changes&lt;/i&gt; us.

I understand that the church has botched the message so poorly with the gay community that it is understandable that there is confusion, but the fact remains; there should be no question about &#039;affirming&#039; people as they are.  The question is not about who we really are, or what is really going on inside of us, nor is the question how stable and wonderful our partnerships might be, the real question is, &lt;i&gt;who does God want us to become?&lt;/i&gt;

On this question, I am sure that you can see (even if you have honest disagreements with the position) that there are those of us who simply cannot find any room for homosexual behavior in who God has revealed Himself to be.

This is worlds apart from hating, fearing, disliking, homosexual people.  Would you be willing to acknowledge that and begin to speak from within that perspective in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Church is often very hypocritical, and sinful, in the way the we have dealt with homosexual people and with the issue in general, but it seems you paint with too broad a brush as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Is there really no room for someone to call homosexual behavior sin without being labeled a bigot?</p>
<p>In our church homosexual people are welcomed, but homosexual behavior is considered sin.  To ask for us to affirm something that we believe scripture is clear on denying, is to ask us to violate our conscience, surely you understand that?</p>
<p>I recognize that there are many who are motivated by fear of homosexuals because of the cultural pressure to do so, and because they have never known any&#8230;  but I am sure you recognize that there are those of us in the church who fall into a different category?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see Jesus affirming anyone, welcoming everyone while simultaneously inviting them to become the kind of person whom God can affirm.  Accepting Jesus&#8217; welcome <i>changes</i> us.</p>
<p>I understand that the church has botched the message so poorly with the gay community that it is understandable that there is confusion, but the fact remains; there should be no question about &#8216;affirming&#8217; people as they are.  The question is not about who we really are, or what is really going on inside of us, nor is the question how stable and wonderful our partnerships might be, the real question is, <i>who does God want us to become?</i></p>
<p>On this question, I am sure that you can see (even if you have honest disagreements with the position) that there are those of us who simply cannot find any room for homosexual behavior in who God has revealed Himself to be.</p>
<p>This is worlds apart from hating, fearing, disliking, homosexual people.  Would you be willing to acknowledge that and begin to speak from within that perspective in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59963</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59963</guid>
		<description>And Chris, to state the obvious, it&#039;s clear from Adam&#039;s post there are specific PCUSA churches opposed to gays and lesbians being in the church, ordained or not, as the opposition group to Lisa Large&#039;s ordination shows.  Churches elect elders to go to Presbytery meetings to vote on behalf of the particular church.  I don&#039;t know if any of those churches spend money on anti-homosexual campaigns, probably none.

But to assume that no churches, even Presbyterian ones, don&#039;t do spend money in that way whether it&#039;s a thousand or a million, is pretty naive.  I&#039;m willing to bet some Presbyterian churches in California sent some money to the Say Yes to Prop 8 Campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Chris, to state the obvious, it&#8217;s clear from Adam&#8217;s post there are specific PCUSA churches opposed to gays and lesbians being in the church, ordained or not, as the opposition group to Lisa Large&#8217;s ordination shows.  Churches elect elders to go to Presbytery meetings to vote on behalf of the particular church.  I don&#8217;t know if any of those churches spend money on anti-homosexual campaigns, probably none.</p>
<p>But to assume that no churches, even Presbyterian ones, don&#8217;t do spend money in that way whether it&#8217;s a thousand or a million, is pretty naive.  I&#8217;m willing to bet some Presbyterian churches in California sent some money to the Say Yes to Prop 8 Campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59962</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59962</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s pretty common knowledge that Southern Baptists and Presbyterian Church of America don&#039;t allow homosexuals to be members of their congregations unless the gay or lesbian person denounces their lifestyle and confesses their sin. 

There is also within the PCUSA and some other denominations, the Confession Church Movement which contains a key belief about homosexuals are sinful and shouldn&#039;t be ordained.  Each of those particular churches have different views on whether gays and lesbians can be members.  Some places they are allowed as long as they don&#039;t become elders or pastors. Other places might forbade it completely.

There is a list of churches on the Layman website. The Layman is a fundamentally conservative voice in the PCUSA that writes numerous articles railing against homosexuality.

http://www.layman.org/Home/Evangelism/Confessingchurches.aspx

Again, pretty common knowledge that there are churches of all denominations in existence who spend more money and time on crusading against gays and lesbians than they do any other types of ministry.  There&#039;s Dobson of Focus on the Family, Pat Robertson and the 700 Club and millions of Christians and therefore numerous churches that tune into every hateful anti-homosexual word and believe it to be gospel.

All you have to do is read a news article or watch a video and see that people get more upset and angry (volatile and violent even) over someone who is gay more so than someone who is starving to death.

No assumptions here. That&#039;s reality.  Check out &quot;For the Bible Tells Me So&quot; great documentary about the issue, very eye-opening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s pretty common knowledge that Southern Baptists and Presbyterian Church of America don&#8217;t allow homosexuals to be members of their congregations unless the gay or lesbian person denounces their lifestyle and confesses their sin. </p>
<p>There is also within the PCUSA and some other denominations, the Confession Church Movement which contains a key belief about homosexuals are sinful and shouldn&#8217;t be ordained.  Each of those particular churches have different views on whether gays and lesbians can be members.  Some places they are allowed as long as they don&#8217;t become elders or pastors. Other places might forbade it completely.</p>
<p>There is a list of churches on the Layman website. The Layman is a fundamentally conservative voice in the PCUSA that writes numerous articles railing against homosexuality.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.layman.org/Home/Evangelism/Confessingchurches.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.layman.org/Home/Evangelism/Confessingchurches.aspx</a></p>
<p>Again, pretty common knowledge that there are churches of all denominations in existence who spend more money and time on crusading against gays and lesbians than they do any other types of ministry.  There&#8217;s Dobson of Focus on the Family, Pat Robertson and the 700 Club and millions of Christians and therefore numerous churches that tune into every hateful anti-homosexual word and believe it to be gospel.</p>
<p>All you have to do is read a news article or watch a video and see that people get more upset and angry (volatile and violent even) over someone who is gay more so than someone who is starving to death.</p>
<p>No assumptions here. That&#8217;s reality.  Check out &#8220;For the Bible Tells Me So&#8221; great documentary about the issue, very eye-opening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59961</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59961</guid>
		<description>Chris,
To clarify I never said that it was Presbyterian churches spending money on anti-homosexual campaigns.

 It is pretty common knowledge that there have been some mega churches and denominations like the Baptists and the Catholics who have spent millions of dollars on Proposition 8 or anti-homosexual material.  Currently in Uganda, Christians are trying to push a Anti-Homosexual bill through the government and into law.

I recall hearing or reading an article years back about a fundamentally conservative mega church that was spending something like 8 million on billboards that said homosexuality was a sin.  I&#039;m sorry I don&#039;t recall the specific church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
To clarify I never said that it was Presbyterian churches spending money on anti-homosexual campaigns.</p>
<p> It is pretty common knowledge that there have been some mega churches and denominations like the Baptists and the Catholics who have spent millions of dollars on Proposition 8 or anti-homosexual material.  Currently in Uganda, Christians are trying to push a Anti-Homosexual bill through the government and into law.</p>
<p>I recall hearing or reading an article years back about a fundamentally conservative mega church that was spending something like 8 million on billboards that said homosexuality was a sin.  I&#8217;m sorry I don&#8217;t recall the specific church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59960</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59960</guid>
		<description>Andy you wrote:

What I do know is that there are churches who don’t allow gays, lesbians who are in healthy, loving and committed relationships to worship in their congregations much less be ordained. There are churches who spend exorbitant amounts of money (in the millions) to crusade against homosexuals while not giving a dime to the poor. 

Name one Presbyterian church that does this please.  Call them out here.  I struggle when people make claims and assumptions and then don&#039;t back it up, so please, back it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy you wrote:</p>
<p>What I do know is that there are churches who don’t allow gays, lesbians who are in healthy, loving and committed relationships to worship in their congregations much less be ordained. There are churches who spend exorbitant amounts of money (in the millions) to crusade against homosexuals while not giving a dime to the poor. </p>
<p>Name one Presbyterian church that does this please.  Call them out here.  I struggle when people make claims and assumptions and then don&#8217;t back it up, so please, back it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59958</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59958</guid>
		<description>Help a brother out here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help a brother out here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget Church or Who gets to decide questions of sexual morality? — Queer Messages</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59956</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget Church or Who gets to decide questions of sexual morality? — Queer Messages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59956</guid>
		<description>[...] Amos asked yet another question at Adam&#8217;s post re: Lisa Larges: who gets to decide matters related to sexuality? Sorry, that&#8217;s my question. Amos asked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amos asked yet another question at Adam&#8217;s post re: Lisa Larges: who gets to decide matters related to sexuality? Sorry, that&#8217;s my question. Amos asked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59955</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59955</guid>
		<description>Amos,
The question &quot;Churches should be allowed to make decisions about what counts and what doesn’t count as sexual morality. Agree or disagree?&quot; is broad and attempt to set up a black-and-white conversation.  

Churches already make decisions about what counts and doesn&#039;t count as sexual morality. Do I agree with every church&#039;s definition of what counts and doesn&#039;t count as sexual morality? No.  Do I agree that a church should use its decisions on sexual morality to condemn, judge and hate others who don&#039;t believe the same way they do? No.  Do I agree that a church&#039;s decision on what counts or doesn&#039;t count as sexual morality mean they have a clear understanding of sexual morality and human sexuality? No.  Do I agree that a church&#039;s decision, etc., is the correct one? No.

This is much more complex than agreeing or disagreeing whether churches should be allowed to make decisions?  We&#039;ve got to be looking a lot deeper in our souls and hearts at more serious questions such as how a church or individual Christian defines sexual morality and understands human sexuality within  the context of faith in a post-post-modern world.

Help me understand why you agree that churches should be allowed to make decisions on sexual morality and how those decisions impact people and communities of faith?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amos,<br />
The question &#8220;Churches should be allowed to make decisions about what counts and what doesn’t count as sexual morality. Agree or disagree?&#8221; is broad and attempt to set up a black-and-white conversation.  </p>
<p>Churches already make decisions about what counts and doesn&#8217;t count as sexual morality. Do I agree with every church&#8217;s definition of what counts and doesn&#8217;t count as sexual morality? No.  Do I agree that a church should use its decisions on sexual morality to condemn, judge and hate others who don&#8217;t believe the same way they do? No.  Do I agree that a church&#8217;s decision on what counts or doesn&#8217;t count as sexual morality mean they have a clear understanding of sexual morality and human sexuality? No.  Do I agree that a church&#8217;s decision, etc., is the correct one? No.</p>
<p>This is much more complex than agreeing or disagreeing whether churches should be allowed to make decisions?  We&#8217;ve got to be looking a lot deeper in our souls and hearts at more serious questions such as how a church or individual Christian defines sexual morality and understands human sexuality within  the context of faith in a post-post-modern world.</p>
<p>Help me understand why you agree that churches should be allowed to make decisions on sexual morality and how those decisions impact people and communities of faith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UMJeremy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59954</link>
		<dc:creator>UMJeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59954</guid>
		<description>Great article here, Adam.  I&#039;m both saddened and unsurprised that the Presbys are dealing with this in similar ways that the Methodists are.  Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article here, Adam.  I&#8217;m both saddened and unsurprised that the Presbys are dealing with this in similar ways that the Methodists are.  Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Larges&#8217; Scruples &#171; Queermergent</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59953</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Larges&#8217; Scruples &#171; Queermergent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59953</guid>
		<description>[...]  Posted on November 16, 2009 by queermergent   If you have not already heard, Lisa Larges, an openly gay woman, was FINALLY ordained in San Francisco in the PresbyterianChurch after 20 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Posted on November 16, 2009 by queermergent   If you have not already heard, Lisa Larges, an openly gay woman, was FINALLY ordained in San Francisco in the PresbyterianChurch after 20 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59952</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59952</guid>
		<description>I only asked the question that way because I think the rest of the discussion hangs on our answer to this question.  You heard antagonism?  Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only asked the question that way because I think the rest of the discussion hangs on our answer to this question.  You heard antagonism?  Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pomomusings.com/2009/11/13/lisa-larges/#comment-59951</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pomomusings.com/?p=5031#comment-59951</guid>
		<description>Also, as a side, it would be helpful if you explained why you agree that churches should be allowed to decide sexual morality instead of just saying &quot;agree&quot; and expecting an &quot;agree&quot; or &quot;disagree&quot; response.  You sound a bit antagonistic, as if you&#039;re itching for a fight.  That will not get the conversation going anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, as a side, it would be helpful if you explained why you agree that churches should be allowed to decide sexual morality instead of just saying &#8220;agree&#8221; and expecting an &#8220;agree&#8221; or &#8220;disagree&#8221; response.  You sound a bit antagonistic, as if you&#8217;re itching for a fight.  That will not get the conversation going anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
